Fearless Reason

Fearless reason in an age of frightened absurdity.

Tag: Innovation

Big Problems, Little Solutions

It is often said that America has big problems that require big solutions. To this, I would say they are half right. We as a country have much to overcome, not least of which is getting our financial house in order. However, as the fiscal cliff looms, and one “big deal” after another gives way to temporary solutions and the kicking of the can down the road, these problems seem ever more insurmountable.

At a time when neither party seems to be able to agree on anything, both appear to agree that the federal government is and should be primarily responsible for addressing the country’s woes. I would contend however, that the fate of this nation should not be left in the hands of a few men with enormous power. The hope of our country, as always, lies in the vast resource of our people.

In the face of insurmountable problems, I propose our federal leaders take radical action. In fact I propose they do the hardest thing anyone with power can do, which is to relinquish that power. America learned long ago that free market capitalism is most conducive to an efficient, innovative and prosperous economy. When people are free to make their own decisions and prosper from them, they innovate, solve problems and by their individual actions create a better more prosperous world. On the other hand, the end of the Cold War and the decline and fall of the Soviet Union taught us that a centralized command economy becomes unsustainable when it reaches a certain level of complexity. A handful of bureaucrats cannot match the efficiency, innovation and flexibility of the invisible hand of the free market.

It is time we recognize that these lessons are not limited to the economic functions of government, but are applicable across the board. Centralization of policy and decision-making at the federal level has resulted in a bloated inefficient federal government, which is incapable of innovation or even carrying out the basic functions of governing. Therefore, I would urge our federal leaders to step aside, and restore to state and local governments the power to govern their people.

We must free the hands of local and state leaders, who understand the problems facing their people. Let the federal government do only that which the federal government can, and leave to the states all else. This was the original vision of our founders and constitution, before the Court rendered the tenth amendment moot. That is not to say I am advocating a return to Lochner, where industry was allowed to run amuck; what I suggest is a return to localism, and re-establishing state and local governments as the focal point of American political life. Let the most ardent red states and blue states realize their most radical ideological excesses, and let the rest of the country learn from their follies and follow a middle path incorporating their successes.

Give to the states the management and control of social security, medicare and medicaid, and give them the power to fund them. Those states that walk a wise and compassionate path that balances the needs of the most vulnerable with economic growth will prosper, while those who chose another path will fail. Those who do not vote at the ballot box will vote with their feet, and the ideological winners and losers will quickly become apparent by the success or failure of their states.

America is a large and diverse country, filled with talented people with different values and ideas. Yet the fate of all has been hitched to the decisions and faults of a few men in Washington, who with their narrow scope of experiences and ideas go about making policy for all. Where the wisdom of a few fails, perhaps the wisdom of the many can do better.

Radically Optimistic

As a bookish and introverted child I developed a fascination with science fiction that has continued to this day. At its best this fascination has led me to explore possibilities and ways of thinking that I might otherwise never have encountered. At its worst, science fiction has been a means of escaping reality and not dealing with the present. For good or ill both my intellect and imagination have been shaped by fantasy, and it is to fantasy that I owe this post’s inspiration.

I grew up on the adventures of Captain Kirk and Picard, and long held the latent expectation that the universe is full of attractive humanoid aliens, who speak perfect English, and prefer Earth men to all others. Along with this expectation of intergalactic adventure and seduction was the assumption that human travails are temporal, and that humanity will innovate its way to prosperity and enlightenment. More recently however, I have come to more critically examine this childish expectation as it comports with adult reality.

Most people are in some way influenced by the Star Trek optimism I allude to above. As many have observed, technology has itself become a sort of religion. Monotheistic in nature, those who worship at the alter of the machine place their faith in innovation. The most devout of these adherents espouse a gospel of “things will be ok” and “do what you like today, fore tomorrow we will figure out how to avoid the consequences.”

Most will agree with the proposition that fundamentalists are dangerous. Fundamentalists are irrational, often violent, and inclined to ignore or distort entire segments of reality. Because they are so dangerous, most governments devote enormous resources to seeking them out and neutralizing them, lest they become a danger to the larger society. However, to identify fundamentalists, we must first decide that a set of ideas held by an identifiable group of people is so unbending and out of sync with reality, that the group and ideas are dangerous.

I contend that there is a new sort of fundamentalist out there, who is more malignant and numerous than the rest, and is in desperate need of identification and neutralization. As you may have guessed, these radicals belong to the cult of technology, and go by the name,  “Radically Optimistic.”

The Radically Optimistic transcend creed, nationality, socioeconomic status, and political ideology. Which would make them illusive, but for their numerosity. These radicals seem to hold the following propositions to be inviolate: the Earth contains unlimited resources, the limits of technology are endless, all 7 billion inhabitants of Earth can and should live like Americans,  humans will be delivered from any hypothetical or real peril by human ingenuity (without any personal effort or contribution by the adherent), and most importantly, things will eventually work out (again, without any personal effort or contribution by the adherent).

Though I write this post with tongue in cheek,  I could not be more serious about the underlying issues. Most new data suggests that life is fairly abundant in the universe. However, to me at least, that no longer also suggests that the universe is also full of lithe and beautiful humanoid women.

Simple lifeforms are probably fairly common in the universe. Intelligence may even be common. What is likely uncommon, is intergalactic advanced civilizations. Life is easy, all you need is a few cells capable of reproduction. Intelligence to some degree is also attainable by many simple organisms. But advanced civilization, that is a different matter.

Think of all the things a species must overcome to reach past its own planet into the stars. First, they must manage to develop the technology to escape the gravitational pull of their planet to reach space; second, they must somehow, either by design of luck, not destroy themselves in the process; and third, they must not fall victim to Radical Optimism upon achieving these remarkable things.

In the end it seems to be a question of overcoming hubris. Maybe other species are more modest than humans.

End of an Era

It seems appropriate that my first post is about the end of life as we know it. Few topics so perfectly represent the generic melodrama of the popular discourse of the Absurd. What follows is a reasonable man’s dissent.

The “end of world” crowds have a secret. Whether their end of world scenario is religious, scientific, or economic; each group shares a common and urgent fear of living. To the desperate, hopeless and overwhelmed the end of existence can be an alluring proposition. It is the ultimate escapism, allowing not only escape from personal hardship, but an end to all human drama and uncertainty.

Yet mankind bounds, crawls and sometimes stumbles forward, day by day, and year by year; narrowly escaping one theory of desolation only to be faced with another.

The radical millenarian who sells all his worldly possessions and gleefully awaits the end of the world is by himself a relatively harmless and isolated figure.  The true and imminent danger to human survival is the agnostic millenarian. This is the man who is passively engaged with the world because he finds the future too disturbing or uncertain to contemplate. He lives for today and yesterday, and his contemplation of the future does not extend past a vague notion of tomorrow or next week. He is a creature of the eternal now, and only tentatively believes in tomorrow. He is a man dangerous not because of his beliefs, but because of his agnosticism. He is the Everyman.

Humanity faces dire but not insurmountable problems. To survive we will have to witness an end of life as we know it. But that does not have to be the end of the world. In fact, it could very well be the dawn of a new era, more prosperous and enlightened than all the others before it. Our true enemy is the inertia of now, and a belief that tomorrow, if it exist at all, will be but a version of today.

Tomorrow’s solutions to today’s problems will be found by fearless minds devoted to reason. It is trite to say, but to survive we must think outside of the box. The unthinkable must be thought, and the unimagined must be materialized. The business of everyday living has a way of moderating and dulling even the brightest and most innovative of minds. We are taught from an early age to go with the crowd, that normalcy is the ultimate aspiration, and that its definition is finite and small. The fearless mind must reject this proposition, and see it for what it is – the frightened absurdity of the doomed.

Let every person with imagination and fortitude devote themselves to one idea: Fearless reason in an age of frightened absurdity.